Strength Training for Plantar Fasciitis and the Intrinsic Foot Musculature a Systematic Review

• Loading metrics

Open up Access

Peer-reviewed

Inquiry Article

Effect of intrinsic foot muscles preparation on foot function and dynamic postural balance: A systematic review and meta-assay

• Ziwei Zeng,
• Min Liu ,
• Lin Wang

Consequence of intrinsic foot muscles training on foot role and dynamic postural residuum: A systematic review and meta-analysis

• Zhen Wei,
• Ziwei Zeng,
• Min Liu,
• Lin Wang

10

• Published: April 20, 2022
• https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266525

Figures

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to analyse the effects of intrinsic human foot muscle (IFM) training on foot function and dynamic postural balance. Keywords related to IFM grooming were used to search four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus and Web of Scientific discipline databases.) for relevant studies published between Jan 2011 and February 2021. The methodological quality of the intervention studies was assessed independently by two reviewers by using the modified Downs and Black quality index. Publication bias was also assessed on the basis of funnel plots. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021232984). Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria (10 with high quality and half dozen with moderate quality). Numerous biomechanical variables were evaluated afterward IFM training intervention. These variables included IFM characteristics, medial longitudinal arch morphology and dynamic postural balance. This systematic review demonstrated that IFM training can exert positive biomechanical effects on the medial longitudinal arch, improve dynamic postural balance and act as an important training method for sports enthusiasts. Future studies should optimise standardised IFM preparation methods in accord with the demands of different sports.

Commendation: Wei Z, Zeng Z, Liu M, Wang L (2022) Effect of intrinsic foot muscles training on foot function and dynamic postural balance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS 1 17(4): e0266525. https://doi.org/x.1371/periodical.pone.0266525

Editor: Peter Andreas Federolf, University of Innsbruck, Austria

Received: July 20, 2021; Accepted: March 22, 2022; Published: Apr 20, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Wei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted utilise, distribution, and reproduction in whatever medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant information are inside the paper and its Supporting Information files

Funding: We would like to express our gratitude to the National Natural Science Foundation of China [11572202], which helped us during data collection and analysis.

Competing interests: The authors take alleged that no competing interests exist.

ane Introduction

Whilst running, the feet deed equally the starting body office of the lower limb kinetic concatenation. Aside from operation as shock absorbers, weight support structures and locomotive effectors [i, 2], the feet tin can resist deformation, provide a stable base of support and lever the arms to propel the body efficiently [3]. Given that the feet are the most distal aspect of the lower limb and the showtime part touching the ground [4], many studies have explored their potential mechanism in transmitting ground reaction strength and established that touch forces tin can be distributed through the active modulation of the activity of muscles, such as the plantar flexor, tibialis anterior and calf muscles [3, 5–7].

The primary Intrinsic pes muscles (IFMs) are abductor hallucis (ABH), flexor digitorum brevis (FDB) and quadratus plantae (QP). Their master function is to provide pes stability and flexibility for stupor absorption [8]; improve dynamic alignment; stiffen the foot arches and stimulate proprioceptors on the sole of the anxiety [ix–12]. IFMs are also categorised as agile subsystems in the pes cadre system and play an important role in static posture and dynamic activities [1, 13]. During the early opinion phase of rearfoot strike running, IFMs are passively stretched every bit the rearfoot initially touches the ground, and the arch of the foot is slowly compressed to absorb impact energy, which is stored in the relevant plantar elastic structure [vi, 12, 14]. In the terminal stance phase, the compressed curvation begins to rebound, releasing previously stored rubberband energy and providing improved propulsion to runners in the button-off stage [12]. This bound-like mechanism of foot muscles provides 8%–17% of the mechanical energy to the torso during every pace [ii, fifteen, 16].

IFMs can exist trained by using several methods, such as brusque human foot practise (SFE), toe-posture exercises, towel whorl exercises and metatarsophalangeal joint (MPJ) muscle training [17–21]. Amid these methods, SFE is the most studied considering information technology utilises the IFMs to describe the metatarsal heads back towards the heel whilst minimising distal interphalangeal flexion [eighteen, 22, 23]. Through IFM training, weakened or inhibited IFMs are activated and pes–talocrural joint neuromuscular command is improved [24], which may assistance prevent running-related injuries, such equally plantar fasciitis [25], foot pronation [26], hallux valgus [27] and chronic ankle instability [28].

While a number of isolated studies have shown benefits of IFM, the applicability of these findings is still limited, to engagement, no previous study has systematically studied these furnishings nor has a meta-analysis been applied to become an overall gauge of the issue of IFM training. Therefore, the electric current study aims to place and decide the effect of IFM training on foot function and dynamic postural residual.

two Methods

2.1 Search strategy

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines [29] and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021232984). PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science bibliographic databases were searched by ii independent authors to place potentially relevant articles from January 2011 to February 2021. The following search terms were applied in the database search: ('pes musculus' OR 'intrinsic pes musculus' OR 'plantar muscle' OR 'intrinsic flexor pes' OR 'toe muscle' OR 'hallux muscle') AND ('training' OR 'exercise' OR 'strength' OR 'strengthening') AND ('foot part' OR 'foot morphology' OR 'pes structure' OR 'pes posture') AND ('dynamic postural balance' OR 'dynamic remainder' OR 'posture stability' OR 'posture control' OR 'postural' OR 'balance'). The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria were used to describe the include studies [30]. An example of the search strategy for the PubMed database is attached in the supporting information. The search strategy was limited to publications in English.

2.2 Written report selection

After duplicate articles were removed, the search results were screened independently by ii authors based on titles, abstracts and full texts on the footing of the following criteria:ane) research specific to IFM training as an intervention (treatments, such as SFE, that emphasise the neuromuscular recruitment of the plantar intrinsic human foot muscles), 2) having at least i desired foot biomechanical parameters (such as navicular drop, pes posture index) and 3) randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or pre-/postintervention studies assessing the effectiveness of an intervention.

2.3 Information extraction and analyses

The following information were extracted: (i) author (yr), (ii) study design, (iii) population characteristics (due east.g. sample size), (iv) interventions (e.g. exercise prescription [sets/repetitions]), (v) issue characteristics (east.g. pes posture alphabetize to describe the parameters of human foot function) and (six) main findings. When the information was unclear, the corresponding writer of the study was contacted via e-mail for clarification.

two.4 Quality assessment

The methodological quality of the included intervention studies were evaluated past two researchers independently using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) calibration [31], which is found to be a reliable and valid measure to evaluate the quality of intervention trials [32], with college scores indicating lower risk of bias. Each detail scoring "yep" contributes 1 signal to the total score, except for the outset item, which relates to external validity. The total PEDro score thus ranges from 0 to ten points. Studies with a total score of at least 6 points are considered to be of adequate quality [32, 33]. Notably, if the trials/studies were listed in the PEDro database (https://world wide web.pedro.org.au/), those scores were used in this review.

2.5 Quantitative information synthesis and analysis

The training effects were calculated and illustrated based on difference between the pre-intervention and post- intervention parameters using forest plots with Review Director version 5.3. Random effects models were used to calculate standardised mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the control and experimental groups. The I^two statistic was used to verify heterogeneity (χ^two) betwixt the included studies. The risk of publication bias was too assessed by using funnel plots.

iii Results

The electronic database search yielded 249 manufactures. After duplicates were removed (29 excluded), a total of 220 eligible articles were included. And then, 203 articles were excluded after reviewing the titles and abstracts, reducing the number of articles to 17. After total text screening, i article was excluded [34]. Finally, the remaining sixteen manufactures met all the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review (Fig i).

three.1 Methodological quality

The results of the gamble of bias assessment using the PEDro calibration can be establish in Table 1. The total scores for the methodological quality ranged from 1 to 8 points. 8 studies [11, 16, 18, 22–23, 26, 35, 36] were moderate quality (PEDro score ≥5) and the others [x, 17, nineteen, 37–41] were poor quality (PEDro score < five). The following items were most commonly reported in the manufactures: random resource allotment (69%), concealed allocation groups (19%), similar at baseline (63%), blinding of the therapist/subject reported in none of the manufactures, and blinding of the assessor in ten articles (63%), follow-upward > 85% (38%), intention-to-treat assay (25%), betwixt-group comparing (88%), Point measures and measures of variability (100%).

iii.2 Study characteristics

The studies included 14 RCTs with sample sizes ranging from 14 to 118 [eleven, 16–19, 22, 23, 26, 37, 39–41] and 2 pre-/postal service-exam designs with sample sizes of north = 12 and n = 21 [10, 36]. The intervention time of the xvi studies varied: 4 weeks [10, 16, 26], 5 weeks [39], 6 weeks [17, 18, 35, 41], 7 weeks [nineteen], 8 weeks [11, 22, 36, 38], 9 weeks [twoscore], 10 weeks [37] and 16 weeks [23]. The details of the study and participant characteristics are presented in Tabular array 2.

3.2.1 Sample characteristics.

The 16 studies included a total of 627 participants. Seven studies included elite long-distance runners (n = 348) [17, 18, 22, 23, 37–39]. Three studies explored the IFMs in patients with human foot planus (n = 75) [eleven, 39, 41], and 6 other studies included simply healthy or asymptomatic subjects (n = 207) [10, 16, 19, 26, 36, xl]. The sample sizes of the included studies ranged from 12 to 118 (hateful = 39). The validity and statistical conclusions of the written report by Hashimoto and Sakuraba (north = 12) were the everyman [38]. Overall, the proportion of males was slightly higher than that of females (54.10%). The historic period of the runners ranged on boilerplate from 20 years onetime to 45 years erstwhile (mean = 27.78), and the body weight of the runners ranged from 50 kg to 76 kg (mean = 67.17). For the foot morphology characteristics, the foot posture indexes in the existing studies ranged from 1 to ten (mean = six). Table 3 shows the details of the sample population characteristics.

iii.2.two IFM foot interventions.

All included studies have various differences in IFM foot interventions. The interventions varied in terms of training methods, do prescriptions and timeframes. In broad terms of the training approaches, the included interventions can be categorised as i. SFE [10, 11, 26, 39, 41], 2. series of foot–ankle musculus training exercises [22, 23, 36, 40], iii. SFE and stability training of the foot [17, xviii, 35], iv. SFE and toe/hallux-extension exercises [16, 37] and 5. interphalangeal joint and MPJ loading exercises [19, 38].

3.3 Event measures

For the characteristics of IFMs before and later on training, the included studies measured the musculus activation ratio (contracted measurement/resting measurement) [16] through ultrasonographic imaging and the thickness [11], cross-sectional areas [22, 36] and volume [22] of the pes muscles by using magnetic resonance imaging (Tabular array two). Additionally, IFM training was measured direct through the hallux or toe muscle strength test [19, 22, 23, 36, 37, 41] and intrinsic pes musculature exam [10] by using a custom-made dynamometer.

Medial longitudinal arch morphology was evaluated on the footing of the navicular drop [10, 11, 26, 39, 41] and arch peak index [x]. These parameters were verified to provide accurate changes in the medial longitudinal curvation. Vi studies (northward = 326) used the multidimensional and comprehensive evaluation of the foot posture alphabetize for the pronation/supination of the feet [11, 17, 23, 26, forty, 41]. This index has been verified to have clinical applications in assessing the hazard of injury in athletes (Table 2).

Dynamic postural balance was evaluated by using some office tests, such every bit the functional movement screen exam [17, 18], the star excursion balance test [10, 39] and clinician-assessed motor performance [xvi] (Table 2). Additionally, Fraser and Hertel [16] explored the participants' perceived difficulty during the toe-all-inclusive, hallux-extension and lesser-toe-extension tests.

three.iv Information analysis

The results of cross-sectional area indicated no meaning effect on the muscle characteristics of the Abductor hallucis (ABH) (P = 0.07), Abductor digiti minimi (ADM) (P = 0.08), Flexor digitorum brevis (FDB) (P = 0.22) and Flexor hallucis brevis (FHB) (P = 0.20).

IFM grooming was observed to have a pregnant upshot on the medial longitudinal arch. The navicular drop (P = 0.02) and human foot posture index (P = 0.0003) after IFM intervention had significantly decreased relative to those after the command treatment. The mean difference was −1.97 (95% CI: -3.57–-0.36) for the navicular drop (Fig 2) and -0.69 (95% CI: -1.06–-0.32) for the foot posture index (Fig 3). No significant heterogeneity was observed amid studies (navicular driblet: I^two = forty%, P = 0.17; FPI: I² = 35%, P = 0.xviii). The bias funnel plots of the navicular drop (Fig iv) and pes posture index (Fig v) did not suggest show of publication bias in the studies included in this meta-analysis.

A significant difference was found for dynamic postural balance afterward intervention. Although diverse role tests were included and were difficult to synthesise, the included studies all demonstrated that IFM training can exert positive furnishings on dynamic postural residue.

four Discussion

This systematic review performed a meta-assay to summarise the current studies that explored the consequence of IFM training on foot biomechanical outcomes. Although potential differences in IFM intervention blazon, fourth dimension or frequency may contribute to the potential heterogeneity of the included studies, the electric current studies verified that IFM preparation would bring positive biomechanical effects and ameliorate dynamic postural balance.

4 included studies (n = 102) explored the effects of IFM grooming on muscle morphology [11, sixteen, 22, 36]. Withal, no meaning divergence was found in terms of the parameters of IFM thickness, cantankerous-sectional surface area and book. Possible explanations for these discrepancies maybe explained by previous studies indicating that small volumes of IFMs are covered past plantar fascia, which would bring barrier to detect the slight changes in foot muscles [11]. Additionally, Taddei et al. [22, 36] likewise established proposed that ABH, FDB and FHB have diverse origins and insertions, unlike lever arm lengths and may exist trained from different degrees during the intervention. Thus, the strength change of unmarried IFMs may exist unlike and difficult to detect. In lite of the difficulty in measuring the minor cantankerous-sectional expanse of IFMs, future studies should employ avant-garde engineering, such as magnetic resonance imaging, to measure out the IFM fat infiltration and cantankerous-sectional expanse after preparation.

Another direct parameter used to describe muscle characteristics is IFM strength. Because that no gilded standard for measuring IFM strength exists [42], the studies included in this review measured IFM force by applying various approaches, such equally pressure platforms [22, 23, 36, 41] or the intrinsic foot musculature test [ten]. Although Day and Hahn [37] verified the positive effect of IFM grooming on muscle forcefulness, no pregnant difference was plant after pooling the data of the included studies. Ane possible reasons for this alien result might be related to the bounty of extrinsic muscles, such as the tibial posterior muscle [43, 44]. Although studies have attempted to avoid possible interference factors past placing the lower limb in a special position, external muscles are still involved during the exam. Dissimilar previous results reported that enhanced IFM forcefulness tin provide additional propulsive impulses, making the pes similar to a stiffened leap during belatedly stance [44, 45], the electric current written report also did not observe whatsoever differences. Hence, the actual effect of force grooming on IFMs needs to exist studied further.

The navicular driblet and arch superlative index are 2 common parameters that describe medial longitudinal arch morphology and dynamic office. IFM exercise is believed to activate weakened IFMs and increment IFM recruitment by intensifying and optimising the tension of the medial longitudinal arch, thereby preventing the excessive lowering of the medial longitudinal arch [10, 46] and related running injuries. This systematic review included 4 studies (northward = fourscore) that utilised the navicular drop [10, 11, 26, 41] and 1 written report (north = 21) that utilised the arch height index [ten] to explore the changes in the medial longitudinal arch. The included studies all demonstrated that the morphology and part of the medial longitudinal arch significantly improved afterward several weeks of intervention. Fifty-fifty though IFM morphology and single musculus strength showed no significant divergence, the overall effect of the medial longitudinal arch was improved. This finding indicated that IFM training can exist recommended as an effective mensurate to improve medial longitudinal arch function and might provide further benefits to people with human foot planus. Moreover, the foot posture index is a validated measure for quantifying foot posture. Five studies (n = 103) demonstrated that foot posture alphabetize tin can rectify aberrant lower extremity alignment and stress on the human foot and related structures [eleven, 17, 26, 40, 41].

Amongst the included studies, several measured the dynamic postural balance after IFM training past utilising the functional motion screen [17, eighteen], star excursion balance test [10], clinician-assessed motor performance and 1-legged long jumping [xviii]. Although diverse methods can be applied to assess dynamic postural rest, the results of the included studies established that IFM training has significant positive effects compared with other interventions. Additionally, of the 2 included studies that subjectively assessed IFM training difficulty and human foot pain in dissimilar situations, the difficulty in motor function perceived by the participants seemed uncomplicated, and the hurting in the foot planus was alleviated.

The principal limitation of this systematic review is that the included studies varied in terms of their interventions' approaches, time and frequency and their participants' characteristics, this variation might compromise this study. In addition, the included studies utilised different methods for assessing IFM strength and dynamic postural balance. Potential heterogeneity and slight publication bias in the analysis may exist. Therefore, caution is warranted when interpreting the findings of this written report.

5 Determination

Although the interventions of the included studies seemed inconsistent, this systematic review demonstrated that IFM preparation tin exert positive biomechanical effects on the medial longitudinal arch, improve the postural balance of the lower limbs and human activity equally an important training method. Futurity studies should optimise standardised training methods in accordance with the demands of unlike sports.

Supporting information

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to those who helped us during the process of this article. I gratefully admit the help of my supervisor Lin Wang, who accept offered me valuable suggestions in this article.

References

1. 1. McKeon PO, Hertel J, Bramble D, Davis I. The foot cadre organisation: a new prototype for understanding intrinsic foot muscle part. Br J Sports Med 2015; 49(5): 290. pmid:24659509
   • View Commodity
   • PubMed/NCBI
   • Google Scholar
2. two. Welte L, Kelly LA, Lichtwark GA, Rainbow MJ. Influence of the windlass mechanism on arch-bound mechanics during dynamic human foot arch deformation. J R Soc Interface, 2018; 15(145): 20180270. pmid:30111662
   • View Commodity
   • PubMed/NCBI
   • Google Scholar
3. three. Seneli RM, Beschorner KE, O'Connor KM, et al. Pes joint coupling variability differences betwixt habitual rearfoot and forefoot runners prior to and following an exhaustive run. J Electromyogr Kines, 2021; 57:102514. pmid:33476861
   • View Article
   • PubMed/NCBI
   • Google Scholar
4. iv. Lieberman DE, Venkadesan Grand, Werbel WA, Daoud AI, D'Andrea S, Davis IS, et al. Foot strike patterns and standoff forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners. Nature, 2010; 463(7280): 531–535. pmid:20111000
   • View Article
   • PubMed/NCBI
   • Google Scholar
5. five. Ceyssens L, Vanelderen R, Barton C, Malliaras P, Dingenen B. Biomechanical Risk Factors Associated with Running-Related Injuries: A Systematic Review. Sports Med, 2019; 49(7): 1095–1115. pmid:31028658
   • View Article
   • PubMed/NCBI
   • Google Scholar
6. half dozen. Holowka NB, Richards A, Sibson Exist, Lieberman DE. The pes functions like a spring of adaptable stiffness during running. J Exp Biol, 2021; 224(Pt 1). pmid:33199449
   • View Article
   • PubMed/NCBI
   • Google Scholar
7. 7. Hart Due north, Nimphius S, Rantalainen T, Republic of ireland A, Siafarikas A, Newton RU. Mechanical basis of bone strength: influence of bone material, os structure and muscle activeness. J Musculoskel Neuron, 2017; 17(three): 114–139. pmid:28860414
   • View Article
   • PubMed/NCBI
   • Google Scholar
8. 8. Kelly LA, Cresswell AG, Racinais Due south, Whiteley R, Lichtwark G. Intrinsic foot muscles accept the chapters to control deformation of the longitudinal arch. J R Soc Interface, 2014; 11(93): 20131188. pmid:24478287
   • View Commodity
   • PubMed/NCBI
   • Google Scholar
9. 9. Garofolini A, Taylor Due south. The issue of running on foot muscles and bones: A systematic review. Hum Mov Sci, 2019; 64:75–88. pmid:30682645
   • View Article
   • PubMed/NCBI
   • Google Scholar
10. ten. Mulligan EP, Cook PG. Result of plantar intrinsic muscle training on medial longitudinal arch morphology and dynamic role. Human Ther, 2013; eighteen(5): 425–430. pmid:23632367
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
11. 11. Okamura K, Fukuda Thou, Oki S, Ono T, Tanaka S, Kanai S. Effects of plantar intrinsic foot muscle strengthening exercise on static and dynamic human foot kinematics: A pilot randomized controlled single-blind trial in individuals with pes planus. Gait Posture, 2020; 75:40–45. pmid:31590069
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
12. 12. Riddick R, Farris DJ, Kelly LA. The human foot is more a bound: human pes muscles perform piece of work to adapt to the energetic requirements of locomotion. J R Soc Interface, 2019; 16(150): 20180680. pmid:30958152
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
13. 13. McKeon PO, Fourchet F. Freeing the foot: integrating the foot cadre system into rehabilitation for lower extremity injuries. Clin Sports Med, 2015; 34(2): 347–361. pmid:25818718
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
14. 14. Chen TL, Wong DW, Wang Y, Lin J, Zhang M. Foot arch deformation and plantar fascia loading during running with rearfoot strike and forefoot strike: A dynamic finite element analysis. J Biomech, 2019; 83:260–272. pmid:30554818
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
15. 15. Ker RF, Bennett MB, Bibby SR, Kester RC, Alexander RM. The spring in the arch of the homo pes. Nature, 1987; 325(6100): 147. pmid:3808070
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
16. xvi. Fraser JJ, Hertel J. Furnishings of a 4-Week Intrinsic Pes Muscle Practice Plan on Motor Function: A Preliminary Randomized Control Trial. J Sport Rehabil, 2019; 28(iv): 339–349. pmid:29364026
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
17. 17. Sulowska I, Oleksy L, Mika A, Bylina D, Sołtan J. The Influence of Plantar Short Human foot Muscle Exercises on Foot Posture and Central Motility Patterns in Long-Distance Runners, a Non-Randomized, Non-Blinded Clinical Trial. PLoS One, 2016; 11(half-dozen): e0157917. pmid:27336689
    • View Commodity
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
18. 18. Sulowska-Daszyk I, Mika A, Oleksy Ł. Bear upon of Short Pes Muscle Exercises on Quality of Movement and Flexibility in Amateur Runners. Int J Environ Res, 2020; 17(xviii): 6534. pmid:32911733
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
19. 19. Goldmann JP, Sanno M, Willwacher Southward, Heinrich Thou, Brüggemann GP. The potential of toe flexor muscles to heighten performance. J Sports Sci, 2013; 31(4): 424–433. pmid:23106289
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
20. 20. Ferreira JSSP Cruvinel Junior RH, Silva EQ Veríssimo JL, Monteiro RL Pereira DS, et al. Written report protocol for a randomized controlled trial on the outcome of the Diabetic Foot Guidance System (SOPeD) for the prevention and treatment of foot musculoskeletal dysfunctions in people with diabetic neuropathy: the FOotCAre (FOCA) trial I. Trials, 2020; 21(1):73–87. pmid:31931855
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
21. 21. Matias AB, Taddei UT, Duarte M, Sacco IC. Protocol for evaluating the effects of a therapeutic foot exercise plan on injury incidence, foot functionality and biomechanics in long-distance runners: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:160–171. pmid:27075480
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
22. 22. Taddei UT, Matias AB, Ribeiro FI, Bus SA, Sacco ICN. Effects of a human foot strengthening program on pes muscle morphology and running mechanics: A proof-of-concept, single-blind randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther Sport, 2020; 42:107–115. pmid:31962191
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
23. 23. Taddei UT, Matias AB, Duarte M, Sacco ICN. Human foot Cadre Grooming to Prevent Running-Related Injuries: A Survival Analysis of a Single-Bullheaded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Sports Med, 2020; 48(14): 3610–3619. pmid:33156692
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
24. 24. Maeda N, Hirota A, Komiya M, Morikawa M, Mizuta R, Fujishita H, et al. Intrinsic foot musculus hardness is related to dynamic postural stability afterwards landing in salubrious young men. Gait Posture, 2021; 86:192–198. pmid:33756408
    • View Commodity
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
25. 25. Huffer D, Hing W, Newton R, Clair M. Forcefulness training for plantar fasciitis and the intrinsic foot musculature: A systematic review. Phys Ther Sport, 2017; 24:44–52. pmid:27692740
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
26. 26. Pabon-Carrasco K, Castro-Mendez A, Vilar-Palomo S, Jiménez-Cebrián AM, García-Paya I, Palomo-Toucedo IC. Randomized Clinical Trial: The Effect of Exercise of the Intrinsic Muscle on Human foot Pronation. Int J Environ Res, 2020; 17(thirteen):4882. pmid:32645830
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
27. 27. Kim MH, Kwon OY, Kim SH, Jung DY. Comparison of muscle activities of abductor hallucis and adductor hallucis betwixt the brusk foot and toe-spread-out exercises in subjects with mild hallux valgus. J Back Musculoskelet, 2013; 26(two): 163–168. pmid:23640317
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
28. 28. Lee DR, Choi YE. Effects of a 6-calendar week intrinsic foot muscle exercise program on the functions of intrinsic human foot musculus and dynamic balance in patients with chronic ankle instability. J Exer Rehab, 2019; fifteen(5):709–714. pmid:31723561
    • View Commodity
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
29. 29. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ, 2009; 172–181. pmid:19622551
    • View Commodity
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
30. 30. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) Methodology Review Group, editor. Report on the review of the method of grading guideline recommendations. Edinburgh: SIGN 1999
31. 31. Macedo LG, Elkins MR, Maher CG, Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Sherrington C. At that place was evidence of convergent and construct validity of Physiotherapy Evidence Database quality scale for physiotherapy trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63(8):920–925. pmid:20171839.
    • View Commodity
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
32. 32. Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins One thousand. Reliability of the PEDro calibration for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003; 83: 713–721. pmid:12882612.
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
33. 33. Armijo-Olivo S, da Costa BR, Cummings GG, Ha C, Fuentes J, Saltaji H, et al. PEDro or Cochrane to Assess the Quality of Clinical Trials? A Meta-Epidemiological Study. PLoS One. 2015; x: e0132634. pmid:26161653.
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
34. 34. Vincent KR, Vincent HK. Use of Foot Doming for Increasing Dynamic Stability and Injury Prevention in Runners and Athletes. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2018;17(x):320–321. pmid:30300191.
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
35. 35. Sulowska I, Mika A, Oleksy 50, Stolarczyk A. The Influence of Plantar Brusk Foot Musculus Exercises on the Lower Extremity Muscle Force and Ability in Proximal Segments of the Kinematic Concatenation in Long-Altitude Runners. Biomed Res Int, 2019, 2019:6947273. pmid:30719446
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
36. 36. Taddei UT, Matias AB, Ribeiro FI, Inoue RS, Charabanc SA, Sacco ICN. Effects of a therapeutic foot practice programme on injury incidence, foot functionality and biomechanics in long-distance runners: Feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther Sport, 2018, 34: 216–226. pmid:30388670
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
37. 37. Mean solar day EM, Hahn ME. Increased toe-flexor muscle strength does non alter metatarsophalangeal and ankle articulation mechanics or running economy. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(23):2702–2710. pmid:31608832.
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
38. 38. Hashimoto T, Sakuraba K. Forcefulness Preparation for the Intrinsic Flexor Muscles of the Foot: Effects on Muscle Force, the Foot Arch, and Dynamic Parameters Earlier and After the Training. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014; 26(3): 373–376. pmid:24707086
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
39. 39. Kim EK, Kim JS. The effects of short human foot exercises and arch back up insoles on improvement in the medial longitudinal arch and dynamic balance of flexible flatfoot patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016, 28(11):3136–3139. pmid:27942135
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
40. 40. Sánchez-Rodríguez R, Valle-Estévez S, Fraile-García PA, Martínez-Nova A, Gómez-Martín B, Escamilla-Martínez E. Modification of Pronated Foot Posture afterwards a Plan of Therapeutic Exercises. Int J Environ Res, 2020, 17(22): 8406. pmid:33202893
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
41. 41. Unver B, Erdem Eu, Akbas E. Furnishings of Curt-Foot Exercises on Pes Posture, Pain, Disability, and Plantar Pressure in Human foot Planus. J Sport Rehabil, 2019, 29(4): 436–440. pmid:30860412
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
42. 42. Soysa A, Hiller C, Refshauge 1000, Burns J. Importance and challenges of measuring intrinsic foot muscle strength. J Foot Ankle Res, 2012, 5(1): 29. pmid:23181771
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
43. 43. van der Merwe C, Shultz SP, Colborne GR, Fink PW. Pes Musculus Strengthening and Lower Limb Injury Prevention. Res Q Exerc Sport, 2020, one–8. pmid:32633706
    • View Commodity
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
44. 44. Farris DJ, Kelly LA, Cresswell AG, Lichtwark GA. The functional importance of human foot muscles for bipedal locomotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2019, 116(5): 1645–1650. pmid:30655349
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
45. 45. Alexander J, Willy RW, Napier C, Bonanno DR, Barton CJ. Infographic. Running myth: switching to a not-rearfoot strike reduces injury adventure and improves running economic system. Brit J Sport Med, 2020, bjsports-2020-102262. pmid:32423913
    • View Article
    • PubMed/NCBI
    • Google Scholar
46. 46. Sauer LD, Beazell J, Hertel J. Considering the Intrinsic Pes Musculature in Evaluation and Rehabilitation for Lower Extremity Injuries: A Case Review. Athletic Training & Sports Health Care, 2011, 2(1): 43–47. https://doi.org/10.3928/19425864-20100730-02
    • View Article
    • Google Scholar

gonzalezapse1978.blogspot.com

Source: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266525

Share this post